PREFERENCIA DE Aedes aegypti y Culex quinquefasciatus POR SITIOS DE REPOSO INTRA Y PERIDOMICILIO EN MONTERREY, N. L., MEXICO
Abstract
Se seleccionaron al azar 67 casas que se encontraban dentro del área metropolitana de la ciudad de Monterrey, Nuevo León, con el propósito de analizar si Ae. aegypti y Cx. quinquefasciatus presentan alguna preferencia por reposar en sitios intra y peridomicilio se utilizó el análisis de correspondencia simple y de conglomerados para determinar el grado de dependencia y similitud entre los sitios de reposo y la cantidad de ejemplares colectados. Se encontró que Ae. aegypti tiene preferencia por reposar en baños, superficies oscuras, a temperatura de 30-35°C y humedad relativa entre 50-60%; mientras que Cx. quinquefasciatus prefirió reposar en el patio y dentro de la habitación, mostraron preferencia por las superficies de color oscuro, temperatura de 25-30ºC y humedad relativa delentre 60-70%. Las variables: humedad relativa, temperatura y color, se encuentran estrechamente ligadas (asociadas), con la presencia de cada una de las dos especies.
Abstract
Sixty seven houses within the Monterrey, Nuevo Leon metropolitan area were randomly selected; to analyze for differences in indoor and house perimeter resting sites preference between Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. simple correspondence and conglomerate analysis were used to determine degree of dependence and likeness between resting sites and number of collected specimen.s Results showed that Ae. aegypti has preference for bathrooms and dark surfaces to rest, at a temperature of 30-35°C and 50-60% humidity. On the other hand, Cx. quinquefasciatus preferred the house perimeter (backyard) to rest; when found indoors, they showed preference for dark colored surfaces at a temperature of 25-30°C and 60-70% humidity. Analysis showed that relative humidity, temperature and surface color were closely related (associated) to the presence of both species.
Palabras clave: Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, reposo, sitios.
Downloads
References
Harwood RF and MT James 1993. Entomología Médica y Veterinaria, Editorial Limusa, México D.F.,:12 - 201.
Organización Mundial de la Salud. 1993 Aplicación de la Estrategia Mundial de Lucha contra el Paludismo.Ginebra:OMS;. (Serie de informes técnicos 839).
Carrada Bravo, T. 1984 El dengue como un problema de salud pública. Avances y Perspectivas. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex;(6):301-306.
Gómez Dantés H. 1995 Dengue en México, Situación epidemiológica actual. Gac Med Mex. 1195;(2):237240.
Kumate, J. Dengue clásico y hemorrágico en México. Gac Med Mex. 1989;(1-2): 37 - 39.
Jelinek T.Dengue fever in internationals travellers. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31(1): 144-147.
Montesano RA. La vigilancia epidemiologica del dengue en México. Salud Publica Mex. 1995;37. Suppl: S6467
Narro-Robres J. y H.Gómez-Dantes 1995. Dengue en México. Un problema prioritario de salud pública. Salud Pública Mex.;37.Suppl: S12-20.
IMSS. Boletín estadístico anual de mortalidad 1997. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México, 1198.
Gould, D. J. 1970. Ecological control of dengue vectors on an island in the Gulf of Thailand. Journal of Medical Entomology.;(4):499-508.
Organización Panamericana de la Salud. 1995. Dengue y dengue hemorrágico en las Américas: su prevención y control. Washington: OPS.
Gubler, D. 2000. Surveillance for West Nile Virus in the Americas, PAHO/WHO, Third Meeting of the Surveillance Networks for Emerging Infectious Diseases in the Amazon and Southern Cone Regions,.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2000. Update: West Nile Virus Activity - Eastern United States, 2000. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report.; (49):1044-1047.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1999. Epidemic/Epizootic West Nile Virus in the United States: Guidelines for Surveillance, Prevention and Control.
Blitvich BJ, I Fernández-Salas, JF Contreras-Cordero, NL Marlenee, J. I González-Rojas, N Komar et al. 2003. Serologic evidence of West Nile virus infection in horses, Coahuila State, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis.;9(7):853-856.
Loroño-Pino MA, BJ Blitvich, JA Farfán-Ale, FI Puerto, JM Blanco, NL Marlenee et al. 2003. Serologic evidence of West Nile Virus infection in horses, Yucatan State, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis.; 9(7):857-859.
Boletín de Epidemiología 2004 Semana 34,. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Disponible en:http://www.dgepi.salud.gob.mx/boletin/2004/sem34/pdf/cua8.pdf.
Sarmiento MJ, J Idrovo, M Restrepo, MP Díaz y A González 1999. Evaluación del impacto de la contaminación del embalse del Muña sobre la salud humana. Revista de Salud Pública;1:159-71
Meisch M, C Meek, J Brown and R Núñez 1997. Field trial efficacy of two formulations of Permanone againstCulex quinquefasciatus and Anopheles quadrimaculatus. J. Am Mosq Control Assoc;13:311-320.
Elizondo-Quiroga A., A. Flores Suárez, D. Elizondo-Quiroga, I. Fernández-Salas, R Mercado-Hernández and B. J. Beaty 2006. Gonotrophic cycle and survivorship of Culex quinquefasciatus using stichy ovitraps in Monterrey Northest, Mexico. J. American Mosquito Control Association., 22 (1):10-14.
Clements, A. N. 1999.The biology of mosquitoes vol. 2, 2ra edición. CAB International, New York..
Bisset, JA; M. Rodríguez y Y De Armas. Comparación de 2 poblaciones de mosquitos Aedes aegypti de Santiago de Cuba con diferente conducta de reposo Rev. cuba. med. trop;57(2): 143-150
Reisen W., C.Hayes, K. Azar, S. Niaz, F. Mahmood, T.Parveen and P. Boreham 1982. West Nile Virus in Pakistan. II. Entomological Studies at Changa Manga nacional Forest, Punjab province. Trans. R. Soc. Med. Hyg.;(76):437-442.
Reisen W. and M Milby 1986. Population dynamics of some Pakistan mosquitoes: Charges in adult relative abundance over time and space. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit.;80:53-68.
Lowe R. E. and D.L. Bailey 1979. Comparison of maning and evening captures of adults female Anopheles albimanus from stables in El Salvador. Mosquito News;39:532-540.
Forattini, O. P. 1998. Mosquitos Culicidae como vetores emergentes de infeccoes.Rev. Saúde Pública, Sao Paulo. Brasil;32(6):497-502.
Forattini, O.P., I.Kakitani y M.Mureb Sallum 1997. Encontro de criadouros de Aedes scapularis(Diptera:Culicidae) em recipientes artificiales. Rev. Saúde Pública;3 (5):519-22.
Stein, M.; G. I Oria,. y W. R Almirón,. 2002. Principales criaderos detectados para Aedes aegypti y culicidos asociados (Diptera:Culicidae) en la provincia del Chaco, Argentina. Rev. De Salud Pública;Vol 36 (4).
Darsie, R. and R. Ward 1981. Indentification and geographical distribution of the mosquitoes of North America, North of Mexico. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. Syst. Suplement. 313 pp
Forattini, O. P., Op. Cit.
Idem.
Reisen W., et al, Op. Cit.
Lowe R. E. and D.L.Bailey, Op. Cit
Stein, M., et al, Op. cit
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The rights of the work belong to the author or authors, however, by sending it for publication in the Public Health and Nutrition Magazine of the Faculty of Public Health and Nutrition of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, they grant the right for its first publication in between electronic, and possibly, in print to the Public Health and Nutrition Magazine. The license used is the Creative Commons attribution, which allows third parties to use what is published whenever the authorship of the work is mentioned and the first publication that is in the Public Health and Nutrition Magazine. Likewise, the author or authors will take into account that it will not be allowed to send the publication to any other journal, regardless of the format. The authors will be able to make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in the Public Health and Nutrition Magazine (e.g., institutional repository or publication in a book) provided they clearly state that The work was published for the first time in the Public Health Magazine, Magazine of the Faculty of Public Health and Nutrition of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León.
