COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT AS IDEAL AGAINST IDEAL BODY WEIGHT FORMULAS AND BODY MASS INDEX OF 22 KG/M2 IN YOUNG ADULT WOMEN.

Authors

  • Erik Ramirez López Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Nutrición, Laboratorio de Composición Corporal
  • Debbie Puente Hernández Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Nutrición, Laboratorio de Composición Corporal
  • Nohemí Liliana Negrete López Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Nutrición, Laboratorio de Composición Corporal
  • Araceli Serna-Gutiérrez Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora, Departamento de Sociocultural, Licenciatura en Ciencias del Ejercicio Físico, México
  • Zuli Calderón Ramos Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Área Académica de Nutrición
  • Arianna Omaña-Covarrubias Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Área Académica de Nutrición
  • Elena Flores-Guillen Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Nutrición y Alimentos, Licenciatura en Nutriología
  • Alexandra Tijerina-Sáenz Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Nutrición, Laboratorio de Composición Corporal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/respyn17.1-2

Keywords:

Ideal body weight formulas, perceived ideal body weight, BMI of 22, fórmulas de peso ideal, peso corporal ideal percibido, IMC de 22.

Abstract

SUMMARY

Introduction: Formulas of ideal body weight (IBW) including the body mass index (BMI) of 22 kg/m2 are used under the assumption to provide a healthy weight. Objective: We compare the perceived ideal body weight (PIBW) with the calculated IBW by formulas and the BMI of 22. Methods: We recruited 705 women (20-25 y). Six common formulas and 2 published equations by our team were used. Results: Group regression analysis determined that including the frame size improves the agreement of formulas of Robinson et al, Hammond and Hamwi with the PIBW (p>0.05). Individually, the concordance analysis (higher % of differences <2 kg: PIBW - IBW by formula), determined that for a measured BMI <20, only the Faspyn 1 formula needs to be adjusted by frame size; while Robinson et al, Hammond, Tokunaga (BMI of 22), Faspyn 2 (BMI of 22) and Broca, are equivalent with the PIBW in different intervals of BMI. Conclusions: According to the BMI perceived as overweight (23.8 kg/m2) and perceived as ideal (21.1 kg/m2), caution is suggested when using the IBW formulas for BMI of 22 as a diagnosis. The IBW formulas and BMI of 22 does not necessarily represent a desirable or aesthetic weight.

 

Comparación del peso percibido como ideal con fórmulas de peso ideal y el IMC de 22 kg/m2 en mujeres jóvenes.

RESUMEN
Introducción: El peso ideal calculado con fórmulas (PIF) y con el índice de masa corporal (IMC) de 22 kg/m2 se emplea bajo el supuesto de proporcionar un peso saludable o estético. Objetivo: Comparar el peso percibido como ideal (PPI) contra el PIF y del IMC de 22. Métodos: Se reclutaron 705 mujeres (20-25 años). Empleamos seis fórmulas comunes y 2 publicadas previamente. Resultados: El análisis de regresión grupal determinó que incluir la complexión corporal mejora la concordancia de las fórmulas de Robinson et al, Hammond y Hamwi con el PPI (p>0.05). Individualmente, el análisis de concordancia (porcentaje mayor de diferencias <2 kg: PPI-PIF), determinó que para un IMC <20 kg/m2 solo la fórmula de Faspyn 1 debe ajustarse por la complexión corporal, mientras que las fórmulas de Robinson et al, Hammond, Tokunaga (IMC de 22), Faspyn 2 (IMC de 22) y Broca, son equivalentes con el PPI en diferentes intervalos de IMC. Conclusiones: de acuerdo con el IMC percibido como sobrepeso (23.8 kg/m2) y percibido como ideal (21.1 kg/m2), las fórmulas de peso ideal y el IMC de 22 deben ser usados con precaución en el diagnóstico de peso ideal ya que no necesariamente representan un peso deseable o estético.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhanji S, Khuwaja AK, Siddiqui F, Azam I, Kazmi K. Underestimation of weight and its associated factors among overweight and obese adults in Pakistan: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health., 11(363): 1-8, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-363

Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res., 8(2): 135-60, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/096228099673819272

Bonafini BA, Pozzilli P. Body weight and beauty: the changing face of the ideal female body weight. Obes Rev., 12(1): 62-5, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00754.x

Bouillanne O, Morineau G, Dupont C, Coulombel I, Vincent JP, Nicolis I, Benazeth S, Cynober L, Aussel C. Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. Am J Clin Nutr., 82(4): 777-83, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/82.4.777

Casillas L, Vargas LA. Height and weight charts for Mexican adults. Arch Invest Med., 11(1): 157-741980.

Craig PL, Caterson ID. Weight and perceptions of body image in women and men in a Sydney sample. Community Health Stud., 14(4): 373-831990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.1990.tb00048.x

Crawford D, Campbell K. Lay definitions of ideal weight and overweight. Int J Obes., 23(7): 738-45, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0800922

Donath SM. Who's overweight? Comparison of the medical definition and community views. Med J Aust., 172(8): 375-7, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb124010.x

Engstrom JL, Paterson SA, Doherty A, Trabulsi M, Speer KL. Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in women: an integrative review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health., 48(5): 338-45, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-9523(03)00281-2

Frisancho AR. Anthropometric Standards for the Assessment of Growth Nutritional Status. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press; 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12198

Global Database on Body Mass Index. BMI classification. United States of America: World Health Organization; 2006. Disponible en: http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html.

Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM. Criteria for definition of overweight in transition: background and recommendations for the United States. Am J Clin Nut., 72(5): 1074-812000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/72.5.1074

Lohmann TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric Standarization Reference Manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Book; 1988.

Pai MP, Paloucek FP. The origin of the “ideal” body weight equations. Ann Pharmacother., 34(9): 1066-9, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.19381

Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem., 21(11): 709-720, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1983.21.11.709

Ramírez E, Negrete NL, Tijerina A. El peso corporal saludable: definición y cálculo en diferentes grupos de edad. RESPyN., 13(4), 2012.

Robinson MF, Watson PE. Day-to-day variations in body-weight of young women. Br J Nutr., 19: 225-35, 1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19650022

Rookus MA, Burema J, Deurenberg P, Van der Wiel-Wetzels WA. The impact of adjustment of a weight-height index (W/H2) for frame size on the prediction of body fatness. Br J Nutr., 54(2): 335-42, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19850118

Rössner S. Paul Pierre Broca (1824-1880). Obes Rev., 8(3): 277, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00303.x

Shan B, Sucher K, Hollenbeck CB. Comparison of ideal body weight equations and published height-weight tables with body mass index tables for healthy adults in the United States. Nutr Clin Pract., 21(3): 312-9, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0115426506021003312

Tokunaga K, Matsuzawa Y, Kotani K, Keno Y, Kobatake T, Fujioka S, Tarui S. Ideal body weight estimated from the body mass index with the lowest morbidity. Int J Obes., 15(1): 1-5, 1991.

U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2010.

Width M, Reinhard T. The Clinical Dietitian´s Essential Pocket Guide. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

Published

2018-05-02

How to Cite

Ramirez López, E., Puente Hernández, D., Negrete López, N. L., Serna-Gutiérrez, A., Calderón Ramos, Z., Omaña-Covarrubias, A., … Tijerina-Sáenz, A. (2018). COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT AS IDEAL AGAINST IDEAL BODY WEIGHT FORMULAS AND BODY MASS INDEX OF 22 KG/M2 IN YOUNG ADULT WOMEN. RESPYN Revista Salud Pública Y Nutrición, 17(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.29105/respyn17.1-2

Issue

Section

Artículo Original

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.